Populist impact on civil society

Populism has a significant impact on civil society, influencing social dynamics, interpersonal relationships and the very image of democracy. This political phenomenon provokes heated debates and often polarizes public opinion, generating divisions and tensions within society.

One of the distinctive features of populism is its ability to mobilise and involve the masses (at least, from the rhetorical point of view). Populist leaders often present themselves as people’s spokespeople, using the frustrations and concerns of citizens to build consensus around their own ideas. This direct involvement and the use of simple and accessible language can give voice to sectors of society that feel neglected or marginalised by traditional institutions.

The impact of populism on civil society can be complex and controversial.

On the one hand, populist movements can help revive political debate and involve a wider variety of social actors. The focus on issues that directly affect people’s daily lives can lead to greater interest and political participation by citizens.

On the other hand, populism can also generate divisions within civil society. Populist movements often adopt polarising discourses, creating a narrative of “us against them” that accentuates differences and promotes social conflict. This can lead to a growing fragmentation of society, fueling tensions and hindering constructive dialogue between different social groups.

Moreover, populism can undermine confidence in democratic institutions and weaken the fundamental principles of democracy. The systematic attack on political elites and the tendency to demonise the media and institutions can undermine citizens’ confidence in the democratic system and the functioning of the institutions themselves. This can have negative consequences for social cohesion and the effectiveness of public policies.

Another impact of populism on civil society is how complex and global issues are addressed. Populist movements tend to simplify complex problems, providing seemingly immediate and easy-to-understand solutions. This can reduce the space for in-depth debate, critical reflection and the search for evidence-based solutions. As a result, civil society may face simplified policy decisions that do not adequately address the complexity of the problems.